I agree with Kendall's comment. The quickest way to do away with LIV is to welcome the players back. If Koepka comes back how long before Bryson does the same? LIV will become irrelevant quickly. If the PGA wants LIV to go away then they should start to poach their players, and chalk it up to a failed experiment.
Loved the Prodigal Son framework here. The strategic case for fast-tracking Koepka is kinda undeniable when you frame it as product quality vs symbolic punishment. I remeber a similar debate in tech when execs jumped between Oracle and SAP in the 90s, the companies that welcomed talent back faster ended up with more leverage in recruiting wars. If the tour makes examples out of returners, they're basicaly capping their own roster celing.
If the PGA Tour was smart they issue amnesty to any of the big names. It improves product immediately and cripples LIV permanently all in one fell swoop!
I agree with Kendall's comment. The quickest way to do away with LIV is to welcome the players back. If Koepka comes back how long before Bryson does the same? LIV will become irrelevant quickly. If the PGA wants LIV to go away then they should start to poach their players, and chalk it up to a failed experiment.
Loved the Prodigal Son framework here. The strategic case for fast-tracking Koepka is kinda undeniable when you frame it as product quality vs symbolic punishment. I remeber a similar debate in tech when execs jumped between Oracle and SAP in the 90s, the companies that welcomed talent back faster ended up with more leverage in recruiting wars. If the tour makes examples out of returners, they're basicaly capping their own roster celing.
Existing exemptions but qualifying for non major events should be required. So in Brooks case he could choose to play a few qualifiers or not
If the PGA Tour was smart they issue amnesty to any of the big names. It improves product immediately and cripples LIV permanently all in one fell swoop!